Why choose us?

We understand the dilemma that you are currently in of whether or not to place your trust on us. Allow us to show you how we can offer you the best and cheap essay writing service and essay review service.

Performance of employee

Research Methodology.

Please follow these instructions as they are very important for this chapter:

1.You should begin the Research Methodology chapter by stating, again, the research objectives of the
project. This will enable the reader to make an assessment as to the validity of your chosen research

2.This chapter is that part of the dissertation where you have the opportunity to justify to the reader the
process by which the research questions, which were derived by an analysis of the relevant literature,
were answered.

3.It is not sufficient to say, for example, �suitable respondents were sampled using a quota sampling
technique and then surveyed using a postal questionnaire� and then leave it at that.

4.It might well be the case that, given the problem(s) to be investigated, such a choice of research
methods is entirely appropriate. However, if you have not taken the opportunity to justify your research
choices to a reader they could be correct in assuming that you have, by chance, merely guessed at what
would work and, more by luck than judgement, arrived at the �correct� solution to the problem.

5.The term �methodology�, particularly when employed in the social sciences, does not just mean
method, but also the governing philosophy behind the methods employed


Table of Contents

  1. Chapter 3: Methodology 3
    3.1. Research Philosophy 3
    3.2. Questionnaire 5
    3.2.1. Advantages of Questionnaire 5
    3.2.2. Scale Design 6
    3.3. Questionnaire Design 8
    3.4. Sampling, Data Collection & Analysis 9
    3.5. Ethical Considerations 12


  1. Chapter 3: Methodology
    3.1. Research Philosophy
    Research philosophies have been applied in most of the studies as guides to achieving the
    research objectives. According to Lewis and Thornhill (2009), there are two main research
    philosophies commonly applied by mainstream researchers. These two main philosophies
    include the positivist and interpretivist philosophy (Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). Idyllically, the
    popular research philosophies have been attributed to the noble work of Saunders, Lewis and
    Thornhill (2009). Throughout the tenacity of research studies, researchers have constantly
    applied the two philosophies. According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), the two main
    (positivism and Interpretivism philosophies) have remained applicable in most of the research
    studies in most of the studies subject to their significance in guiding the research studies.
    However, there are varied opinions on the relevance of specific philosophies in various studies.
    To determine the applicability and the validity of a philosophy, the researchers must ascertain the
    relevance of the philosophy being applied. As such, research philosophy has remained a
    commonplace for guided research studies.
    The nobility of a study demands on the philosophy adopted by researchers. Nevertheless,
    researchers maintain that the best choice of philosophy must often conform to the objectives of
    the study. For instance, the philosophy must be a guide towards achieving the aims of the study.
    Therefore, researchers must understand the outlook of the research before they can choose the
    type of philosophy to be applied. The outlook of the research determines the objectives that the
    study seeks to find. According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) the research outlook is
    the general design of the research study that determines how the study is conducted and
    concluded. The research outlook is however blended by the philosophical approaches. As such,

Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) maintain that every research study must be based on a
particular research philosophy.
The research philosophies are known to have very distinctive variations that make them
applicable in specific studies. Every research study has a distinctive outlook. Therefore, it is the
responsibility of the researchers to determine the applicability of the philosophies to a given
study. For example, Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) acknowledge that while applying the
interpretivist philosophy, researchers often ignore the normalities as well as the rules of the
research environment arguing that the changes that are experienced in such environment are
often unforeseeable and, therefore, force individuals to ignore the norms and the rules of the
business environment. On the other side, Wang (2000) reiterate that individuals with their
distinct views are able to propose relevant ideas and arguments.
On the contrary, Hill (2003) reiterates that the positivist philosophy recognises, follows
and upholds the rules and norms of the business environment. This means that every researcher
applying the positivist approach must rely on the background environments of the businesses. In
this philosophy, the researchers must, therefore, be able to apply the scientific methods that help
in the determining the nature of the business environments. As such, it is arguable that the
philosophy states the standards as well as the rules that future researchers will rely on in their
future studies. Interpretivism has blended the research studies in very many instances. Taylor
(2005) argues that this philosophy has unveiled uncountable advantages to researchers.
Scientific studies are often complex in nature and require extensive comparison. In this
sense, researchers normally employ interpretivist approach. In this research study, interpretivist
philosophy has been applied with the view of determining both the external and internal factors
affecting the performance of employees in the Qatari state O+G company. Ideally, it sets the

rules upon which the researchers lay out their studies. In this research study, the researchers has,
therefore, chosen the interpretivist research philosophy over the positivist philosophy. Since the
study sought to consider the rules, guidelines as well as the standards that control the business
environments in most of the common organisations, this approach has helped in determining how
the various internal and external factors affect the employee affect the productivity of employees
in oil and gas companies in state of Qatar after the 2015 oil drop (Tsai & Wang, 2013).
It is significant for the researchers to study how factors such as the compensation
structure, job security and workforce autonomy affect employees’ productivity across Qatar
states. On the other hand, this study will apply the available statistical analysis tools to find the
results of the entire study. As such, the study’s primary data collection will be the principal
method of obtaining data in this study. In addition to this, the participants in this study will be
expected to provide information on the impacts of employee jobs security, workforce autonomy
and compensation structures on the productivity of employees working in the a state in Qatar.
While taking note on the interpretivist approach in this study, the study will also be built through
the review of existing literature studies. This means that the researcher will obtain the relevant
information related to the study and use the information to help in answering the study questions.
The literature review and the findings from the existing literature will help in the testing of the
study variables. The study analysis will then be done based on other methods for statistical
analysis such as Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) as well as the Microsoft Excel.
3.2. Questionnaire
3.2.1. Advantages of Questionnaire
In this study, the questionnaire has been used as a primary source of data. To obtain data
from the participants in this study, the questionnaire had been considered as the most appropriate

data collection tool. One of the significance of using the questionnaire is because it will ensure
collection of data independently. As such, the data collected by questionnaire will be specific to
various participants. According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), questionnaires are very
critical tools that can be used in collecting systematic data from a larger sample of many
participants. In many instances, the data from questionnaires can be used in determining the
actual responses of the participants without the interference of the other external individuals.
Although the questionnaires also have certain limitations, Appleton, Song and Xia (2014)
acknowledge the application of the questionnaires in most of the research studies initiate
effective and accurate collection of data. In such cases, the participants are protected and are able
to answer the questionnaire questions without fear or interference.
In this manner, Punch (2013) appraises the application of questionnaires stating that they
are time-saving, cheaper compared to the other conventional data collection methods and able to
be used with the larger samples. In studies where questionnaires are used, the validity of the
findings has always remained high. Taylor (2005), notes that the responses given by most of the
participants in questionnaires are personal sentiments. Questionnaires often give individuals
room for self-expression thus, increasing the levels of valid responses. The questionnaire usage
in both data collection and analysis has been appraised by many researchers. For example,
Taylor (2005) acknowledged that the use of Bruton et al. (2015) makes it easier to analyse and
collected data. The questionnaire helps in the collection of systematic data. This means that the
systematic data can be easier to analyse compared to the non-systematic data.
Conversely, Punch (2013) notes that the use of questionnaire allows both statistical and
descriptive data analysis unlike the other forms of data collection that restrict analysis and
presentation. Based on the nature of the study, the quantitative techniques that will be used in the

collection of data will lead to statistical data analysis (Taylor, 2005). Since the study will also
have its qualitative components, the application of the questionnaire will be appropriate in doing
a qualitative analysis.
3.2.2. Scale Design
According to Taylor, G. (2005) employee performance is affected by a number of factors.
Some of these factors are intrinsic while some of them are extrinsic. Of the extrinsic factors,
Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) note that compensatory structure, the workforce autonomy
and the employee job security remains principal factors affecting the employee productivity. In
this manner, Fan, Wong and Zhang (2013) note that it is important to study the relationship
between the employee performance and these factors. The scale to be designed in this study aims
at identifying the measures that can be used in determining the effects of job autonomy,
employee job security as well as the employee compensation in the Chinese SOEs (Bruton et al.
2015). In order to measure the effects of the stated factors on employee performance, the
researcher will ensure that he/she uses the scale to ascertain the relationships between the factors
and the levels of performance.
This study is to find how the three factors (job autonomy, job security and employee
compensation structures) affect the levels of employee performance in Qatari oil and gas
companies. This being the main focus, the researcher has to compare the views from various
participants. The responses were significant in determining the levels of employee performance
in Qatari O+G companies. Therefore, the scale design will remain critical in ensuring that the
relationship between the factors and the performance is confirmed. The variables of the study
will, therefore, be included and discussed in the following tables.
Measure scale of Compensation


N Item Description

The salary given to the workers is often adequate and reasonable
to all the workers
2 The salary is inadequate and insufficient to most workers
3 The salary is equivalent to the work done by the workers

4 Workers appreciate the salary that they receive from the managers

Workers always complain about the salary that they get from the

All the workers regardless of their performance are entitled to
pension and salary.

Only hardworking employees are rewarded, salaried and entitled
to a pension.
8 Workers work hard because they know that they are pensioned
9 Workers work hard because they know they do not have a pension.

Measure Scale for Job Security
N Item Description
1 The job restriction disallows freedom off-duty
2 The job allows freedom and one may choose to be on duty or not


The work is monitored frequently and keenly and offenders are

Workers job is secure and safe making people free to do what they
5 All workers are entitled to pension
Measure Scale for Workforce Autonomy
N Item Description

Workers choose what they want to do without consulting the

Workers must always work under the instruction and supervision
by the management

Workers have the freedom to work together with the management
of the organisations.

At work, there is support given to the workers by the management
in order to ensure guidance.
5 Workers work alone without the interference of the management.

The workers are usually accurate in doing things by themselves
without the support of the management.


7 Workers often error when not supported by the management
8 Workforce receives guidance from the managers frequently

The workforce guide themselves without the intervention of the
3.3. Questionnaire Design
At the end of the study, the completed questionnaires used in this study were appended as
proof of the results. The questionnaires had the specific components and parts as stated in the
section below.
The first part of the questionnaire had the identity details of the participants as well as the
purpose of the questionnaire. The participants identified themselves with specific codes in order
to ensure that there is anonymity during the study. In this manner, this section also contained the
factors that were to be studied during this research. For example, the section identified factors
such as employee job autonomy, compensation structure and the job security. The participants
(individual workers from the Qatari O+G companies) derived the understanding of the factors to
be studied from this section. In the first part, the participants identified the factors that they are
aware of among the three identified factors. The participants were then being asked in this
section to explain whether they enjoyed these factors or not. This was used as a confirmation that
the participants were aware of the factors that affect their performance.
This first section is significant because it confirms whether the participants are aware of
the factors that affect their performance. In this manner, the scale was designed in a manner that
identified the degree of knowledge to confirm the level of knowledge. This means that the

questionnaire assessed whether the factors (job security, compensation and job autonomy) affect
their work.
The second part of the questionnaire is on the body of the questionnaire. This is where
the researcher assigned responses which constituted a scale 4-pont Likert scale (1-agree, 2-
disagree, 3-not sure, 4-I don’t know) for assessing the level of knowledge on the factors affecting
the employees’ level of productivity. In the fourth sections, the researcher identified the details
of the participants such as the demographics such as name, age, ethnicity, educational level, and
frequency of purchasing as well as the levels of income.
3.4. Sampling, Data Collection & Analysis
The main aim of the study is to determine the factors affecting employees’ performance
in the Qatari oil and gas employees. The interest therefore remains focused on the performance
of the Qatari employees. In this study, there are many correlational factors that was included;
however, the researchers use the three factors (job security, workforce autonomy and employee
compensation structure) to determine how they affect the workforce productivity. Given there is
a difference between the employee performances in Qatar O+G companies explained by extant
literature, the study concentrated on the abovementioned factors. Since the study sought to find
out the effects of these factors on the Qatari O+G employees, the employees in the Qatari state
company were targeted. Although, Brandt, Van Biesebroeck and Zhang (2012) there are many
Qatari companies that are eligible for the study, this study applied a concise sampling criterion in
finding the best individuals to identify those who took part in this particular study. In order to be
able to sample the best individuals for the study, there were factors that the researcher considered

One of the most important factors was the budget size for the study and its economic
impacts to the researcher. Ideally, the high budget forced the researcher to restrict the sample to a
given number of participants. In this manner, the researcher had to come up with another method
of selecting the participants who met the specific eligibility factors. Time constraint was also a
critical consideration that the researcher had to consider. Since there are many companies, the
time that was needed was a lot (Tsai & Wang, 2013). In order to battle the time constraint, the
researcher applied non-probability sampling. This is where participants with specific features
were selected for the study. In this sense, non-probability sampling was the best method as it
gave the research a mature sample for the study.
Additionally, non-probability sampling also improved the convenience during sampling.
This means that the participants selected were individuals who were carefully selected. Since the
sample was made of Qatari workers, Fan, Wong and Zhang (2013) posit that such sampling
ensured that those included in the study were available and easily accessible. This helped in
sampling individuals who ensured that the aims of the study were achieved.
On the contrary, non-probability sampling may also cause biases during sampling of the
participants. Since there was the need in attaining convenience, this method of sampling was
chosen for the study. Only qualified individuals were included in this research study. Some of
the requirements during sampling required participants aged above 18 years, had to be workers
in some of the renowned Qatari oil and gas companies and had to have willingness to take part in
the study till the end.
Based on the requirements, the researcher recruited 100 participants only. This means
that the researcher had to reproduce 105 questionnaires to be used among the participants.
According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) the excess questionnaires help in ensuring

accuracy in the distribution of the questionnaires. This limited the errors that might have arose
during the study. The excess number also ensured that the questionnaires attained the validity
rate. As such, the questionnaires distributed were statistically significant after the study. Larger
samples require larger inputs in order to be able to come up with accurate results. This means
that researchers dealing with larger samples must be able to spend larger amounts of money,
resources, time and energy in conducting the studies.
Dealing with a large population of samples in various studies has remained one of the
challenges for most researchers. However, the researchers may have all the money and resources
needed in conducting surveys with such large samples, but the problem is that such studies may
not yield accurate results. In this sense, it advisable to choose an easily manageable samples that
are easier to work with. This is why this study ensured that the participants selected for the study
were only 100 workers (Du, Tang & Young, 2012). In as much as this study sample is also large,
it is thought to be a sizeable population that the researcher will be able to manage without
limitations. Tsai and Wang (2013) say that there are a number of advantages in working with
smaller populations. Ideally, the smaller populations reduce the time taken in conducting the
study. A smaller sample is easier to manage as compared to the larger populations.
According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), larger populations tend to be
tiresome when assessing. This means that the researchers may overlook some of the important
procedures that are necessary for the processes of the study. While Cheng and Liu (2014)
appraise larger population for the validity and generalisability of the findings from larger
populations, Taylor (2005) negates the idea by saying that larger population lead to dilution of
the results. In this case, the researcher in this study settled for a manageable and affordable
population of participants.

This study was useful in very many ways. According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill
(2009), such studies can be applied in very many situations where similar problems are
experienced. Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), postulate that there are many problems that
are only revealed through research studies. Ideally, findings from this study can be used in
understanding the major cases of the problems that affect Qatari oil and gas company employees.
In trying to find some of the challenges that the workers face in Qatar, the findings will be used
across Qatar. This means that Qatar as a whole will be represented in the study. This, therefore,
calls for concise analysis and interpretation of the findings. In order to be certain of the findings
of the study, the researcher had to, conduct proper research that identified all the factors that
affect the oil and gas company workers.
Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) agreed that primary data collection help
researchers in understanding a number of aspects in the research studies. This data was the
ultimate confirmation that the cited problems are actually present. The data will be relevant in
making viable decisions concerning the performance of the employees in similar companies. The
primary data will also make it easier for the researcher to confirm the claims in the literature
materials. As such, the primary data will be used together with the secondary data in order to
come up with conclusive reports on how compensation, job security and workforce autonomy
affects the performance and productivity of the employees.
The final data from this study will be usable in various oil and gas companies within and
outside Qatar. This study will, therefore, help in determining how the performance of the
employees working in the oil and gas companies can be improved. Ideally, the information
obtained from this study will be relevant in developing standards upon which the O+G
companies can use to increase the levels of performance. Based on the study, there are a number

of O+G companies that face challenges of productivity. In this sense, it is imperative to
incorporate the information from this study in an attempt of improving the performances of the
employees in the company (Du, Tang and Young, 2012). Therefore, the concise analysis will
ensure the use of Microsoft Excel and SPSS. In addition, the correlation between compensation,
job security as well as workforce autonomy and the level of productivity will be analysed.
3.5. Ethical Considerations
The participants’ voluntarism is one of the major issues that are considered as a challenge
in the study. The participants must be aware of the requirements of the study. In this manner, the
study only considered only individuals volunteers who were included in this study. Ideally, this
study considered participant anonymity, therefore; the application of the questionnaire made it
possible to conceal the identity of the participants. However, all the participants had to be
eligible for the study before they were included. This means that individuals who did not meet
the criteria were excluded from the study.


Appleton, S., Song, L., & Xia, Q. (2014) “Understanding urban wage inequality in China
1988–2008: Evidence from quantile analysis”, World Development, 62, 1-13.
Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012) “Creative accounting or creative
destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing”, Journal of Development
Economics, 97(2), 339-351.
Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015) “State-owned enterprises
around the world as hybrid organizations”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1),
Cheng, S., & Liu, J. (2014) “China’s R&D Production Efficiency and Impact Factors”
Transnational Corporations Review, 6(4), 362-378.
Du, F., Tang, G., & Young, S. M. (2012) “Influence activities and favoritism in subjective
performance evaluation: Evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises” The Accounting
Review, 87(5), 1555-1588.
Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2013) “Institutions and organizational structure: The case of
state-owned corporate pyramids”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(6), 1217-
Hill, C. (2003) International business. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Punch, K. (2013) Introduction to social research: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches.
London: SAGE Publications.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009) Research methods for business students.
Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

Taylor, G. (2005) Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Research. New York:
University Press of America.
Tsai, C. J., & Wang, W. L. (2013) “Exploring the factors associated with employees’ perceived
appraisal accuracy: a study of Chinese state-owned enterprises”, The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 24(11), 2197-2220.
Wang, H. (2012) Five New Trends of Chinese Consumers (Online) Forbes.

All Rights Reserved, scholarpapers.com
Disclaimer: You will use the product (paper) for legal purposes only and you are not authorized to plagiarize. In addition, neither our website nor any of its affiliates and/or partners shall be liable for any unethical, inappropriate, illegal, or otherwise wrongful use of the Products and/or other written material received from the Website. This includes plagiarism, lawsuits, poor grading, expulsion, academic probation, loss of scholarships / awards / grants/ prizes / titles / positions, failure, suspension, or any other disciplinary or legal actions. Purchasers of Products from the Website are solely responsible for any and all disciplinary actions arising from the improper, unethical, and/or illegal use of such Products.