DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Designing Quantitative Research
Introduction
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
The results of a research study are significant in the event that they can be considered as
accurate and confidently in their interpretation. The element of accuracy and confidence in the
interpretation of a research study’s result is subsequently dependent on the validity of the study.
Validity in this case infers to the degree in which a research study’s inferences can be articulated
from the results of the study. In consideration of this, there are two primary aspects of validity
that include the internal and the external validity.
Internal Validity
This can be established as the extent in which the results of a research study are
considered as a function of the variables that are manipulated in a systematic way, measured and
observed during a study. An example of this can be seen in a researcher determined to establish
which of the two instructional approaches are superior in teaching a mathematical concept within
a classroom setting(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). The researcher would be intrigued to encourage
two tutors to use each of the instructional methods and then take a comparison of the mean test
scores of each and every class following the use of the instructional method. The validity of this
study can be depicted in the tutors efficiency and enthusiasm in using the instructional method,
the interest of the class and their preparation. In this case, it is essential to establish that some of
the potential threats of internal validity include:
History:
History can be considered as the occurrence of events that are prone to alter the end result
or outcome of a research study. In this case, before conducting a research study, it is essential to
determine that a previous history is likely to have taken place(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). For
instance, a study on the effectiveness of a new concept used in teaching a unit on the biology of a
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
nervous system may be overtaken by history since many students may have watched a
documentary on this on the television.
Maturation:
The aspect of maturation depicts the changes that are likely to occur on the subjects of a
study during the research period. These changes are considered as not part of a study since they
are likely to affect studies results(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). For example, in a biological growth
process, a researcher may be forced to consider the element of weight gain or the increase in an
individual’s height that results from lunch or breakfast programs as a change that may occur
during a study.
Mitigating the Potential Threats of Internal Validity
In addressing the element of history in internal validity, a research may consider using a
control group that is selected within the same population within an experimental group(Haegele,
& Hodge, 2015). This group therefore needs to experience the same history as the experimental
group, an aspect that would eliminate the effects of history. On the other hand, the duration of an
experiment may be shortened in reducing such effects. On the other hand, the effects of
maturation can be compared to those of maturation and can be mitigated through the selection of
the same population from as that of an experimental group and the study period may be
shortened as well.
External Validity
This refers to the extent in which a studies result can be generalized in a confident way to
a larger group that engaged in the study(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). In this case, a researcher
needs to determine the reasons behind the use of variables that are similar to the aspects that
exist within the larger population. Some of the potential threats of an external validity include:
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
The Selection-treatment Interaction:
This is primarily considered as the possibility of the selected participants characteristics
interactions with some elements of the treatment(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). This may therefore
include the participants learning, prior experiences, personality or any other elements that may
interact with the effects of the study.
Effects of an Experimentation Arrangement
This primarily infers to the situations in which the participants of a study become aware
of their involvement in a study and as a result of this, their performance and response changes
from what would have been.
Mitigating the Potential Threats of Internal Validity
The possible approaches of mitigating threats to external validity include the inclusion of
an efficient design by adding treatment or control groups and differential waves of measurement
(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). On the other hand, a researcher may also consider the use of
statistical analysis
Ethical Issue in Quantitative Research
Ethics can be perceived as the development of a good study conduct with the aim of
making moral judgments on the element of good conduct. In quantitative research, one of the
ethical issues that need to be given consideration is the acquisition of the participants consent in
a study(Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). This may influence the design decision of a study since the
researchers may have to include efficient methods aimed at attaining the consents of participants
in a research study.
Amenability of a Research to Scientific Study Using a Quantitative Approach
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
In considering this, it is vital to establish that this element enables a researcher to
scientifically establish the primary causes of his/her observations with the aim of in providing
unambiguous answers to the research studies intent. This element remains essential since without
it, the cause of an effect may not be established and isolated.
Main Issue Post
As established, the primary issues established in this post can be seen in the construction
of a social variable that determines the limitations of racial identity with the biological
differences that exist among races (Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). It is essential to consider that an
individual’s experience on different faces may be viewed as systematically different within
particular societies based on how these societies take cognizance of the element of racial
differences.
An instance of this can be viewed in the manner in which multiple races are socially
contracted among the whites in U.S. Numerous immigrant groups that are now classified as
Whites that include the Eastern Europeans and the Irish populations were first considered as
racially different from other groups that include the North European and Western regions. In this
case, racial identities may be viewed as changing as a result of the assimilation of demographic
groups that differentiate themselves from other groups as a result of political, economic and
social variables.
Response Post
As a researcher, it is credible to take cognizance of the possibilities that result in the
social construction and the manner in which such constructions affect the meaning of a studies
variable. This is ion consideration of the fact that variables are constructed to have immense
influence on studies validity (Haegele, & Hodge, 2015). This therefore requires a clear and
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
concise definition of each and every variable in a study with the aim of increasing the validity of
the study. On the other hand, it is vital to establish the context in which research data is
collected and interpreted.
Conclusion
As determined in this study, the element of internal and external validity plays a
significant role in a study since they determine the confidentiality and accuracy of a research
design.
Reference
DESIGNING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. R. (2015). Quantitative Methodology: A Guide for Emerging
Physical Education and Adapted Physical Education Researchers. Physical Educator,
7259-75.
