comments and constructive criticism
For the two post, the writer will read them and them give a constructive criticism and feedback on each of
the post. For each of the article the writer will use a pear review article to support his comments. The
comments should be very constructive and directly link to the articles, underlining or highlighting the
points made in the articles.
Response to Articles
Response to Article 1
Awesome! There are certain research practices that investigators should pursue.
Preparedness is among the necessary initial practices before handling a literature research.
Researchers need equipping themselves with important information that pertains to their subject
2
RESPONSE TO ARTICLES
of interest. The practice minimizes time wastage and enhances the development of relevant
arguments. Preparedness also allows learners to determine the required writing formats and
styles for their tasks (Concordia University, 2015). Determining the appropriate sources for
literature work should be an aim for researchers. The article could have indicated that online sites
are likely to offer data of a broad variety, but not all the information could be reliable (Driscoll &
Brizee, 2013). Some sources could offer misleading information, either failing in attaining
accuracy or lacking in validity. To ensure that sources are useful and relevant, researchers should
use particular keywords in their search.
Response to Article 2
Great article! There are specific tips that researchers should understand to facilitate their
work. Those who learn the skills of handling literature works are likely to have an easier time in
research than those who are uninformed. Having the skills of utilizing search sites is beneficial to
researchers. The article could have pointed out particular types of activities that researchers can
undertake from different sites. Researchers could for instance use Google Scholar in conducting
both open-ended and focused research types (Vallier, 2015). The utilization of academic libraries
also requires particular skills. Usually, the sites classify information into various categories based
on different properties. For instance, libraries categorize their books on the basis of their subjects
(Sherratt, 2015). People who are conversant with the classifications would get information with
ease.
3
RESPONSE TO ARTICLES
References
Concordia University. (2015). How to write a literature review.
Driscoll, D. L. & Brizee, A. (2013). Evaluating sources: overview.
4
RESPONSE TO ARTICLES
Sherratt, G. L. (2015). Library classification systems. Southern Utah University.
