Growth of China intimidates United States security in the Asia-Pacific

Growth of China intimidates United States security in the Asia-Pacific

Growth of China intimidates United States security in the Asia-Pacific
This essay argues that the ongoing rise of China’s economy and the present
reconstruction and build up of its army has become a root of open challenge for the United
States 1 . For reasons entrenched in history, presently, and future distribution of international

power, the US places a superior priority on administering security issues in the Asia-Pacific
region. Disagreement on the Korean neck of land would have long term and extensive impacts
for the region and the US and its associates 2 . While disagreements in the South and East Seas
seem to be controllable, tensions are liable to be component of the security backdrop for the near
future. In spite of the multitude of multifaceted challenges, environmental, economic,
institutional and so on, the security matter that is lurking on top of the security outline of regional
powers if the rise of China and the possible role of the US in the Asia-Pacific 3 .
The US presumed a heavy responsibility as the chief underwriters of peace and security
in the region. American’s tactical approach to the Asia-Pacific expanse mirrored maritime
Britain’s focal point on conserving a continental stability of power. After the Second World War
and the end of the almost forty years of Chinese Civil War, the US legalized a strategy modeled
to refute any power from controlling the huge Eurasian mainland 4 . In identifying prosperity and
stability all through most of the Asian-Pacific region as a crucial American interest, the country

1 Jeffery, Renée. Evaluating the ‘China threat’: power transition theory, the successor-state image
and the dangers of historical analogies. Australian Journal of International
Affairs. Published online: 26 Jun 2009.
2 Bisley, Nick. Asia’s transformation, international relations and public policy. Australian Journal
of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.
3 Tang, Xiaosong. The future role of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region: dead end or
crossroads? Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 06 Jul 2011.

4 White, Hugh. Power shift: rethinking Australia’s place in the Asian century. Australian Journal
of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.

helped in catalyzing the region’s ensuing impressive political and economic development.
However, it was tactical self-interest that secured US policy.
The rising authority of China in global associations and a continuing move towards
superior power rank have caused apprehension to the level that, how to handle China is the
dilemma of this new century 5 . Just recently, a certain ‘China threat’ hypothesis appeared in world
politics, and after many years, the debate is still going on. A number of predictions have been
introduced about China, but till now, none of them has materialized. The communist heads are
still administering the country, the Chinese economy is still rising, and no bordering nation has
been attacked. The Asian-Pacific region has not been weakened by a forceful China 6 . All these
immaterialized predictions stress the Instability of the best thinking in the arena of world politics,
and the inevitability of their constant revision and the negation to get locked in unwavering
truths. It is once again confirmed that the evaluation of international politics ought to be freed
from system of belief.
The United States see’s the rise of Chinese economy as potential for a powerful
nationalism that will advocate for aggression, xenophobia, and revenge. Without refuting the
presence of a China threat, the global community has more to worry about for global and
regional security from a fragile and disintegrating China, than from a tough and powerful one 7 .

5 DEREK, SCISSORS. The Great China Debate.Will Beijing Rule the World?

6 Ikenberry, G. John. American hegemony and East Asian order. Australian Journal of
InternationalAffairs. Published online: 27 Sep 2010.

7 Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august
2012.

Other potential threats include China’s rural crisis, food crisis, environment crisis, population,
and resources crisis. United States sees these numerous crises as a potential for making the China
a huge burden to the whole world. The rationale is that Chinese economy should not rise
otherwise the world will incur shortages of resources, food, and damage to the environment.
China facades a threat to the US at it differs hugely from it in life style, cultural
traditions, and value concepts. War is inescapable between China and the US. China’s objective
of accomplishing dominant status in Asia-Pacific region conflicts with a pre-determined
American goal which is to prevent any country from attaining overpowering power in Asia. The
US, after all, has been in main warfare’s in Asia in the last half century in attempt to safeguard a
single country from attaining ascendancy even though it was at the expense of decreasing
American military status.
Given the truth that over the next ten years or so China will become an overriding power
in Asia, divergence with the United States could take place over numerous issues, headed by a
Chinese effort to get hold of Taiwan forcefully or to resolve my martial means its regional claims
in the South China Sea 8 . China’s political and technological help to the Islamic nations of North
Africa and Central Asia, and its looming supremacy in East Asia put it at the core of a casual
network of states, most of which have philosophies and goals inimical to the US, and most of
which share China’s rationale of objection at the long international supremacy of the West.
Conclusion

8 Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august
2012.

The rise of China has posed a threat on United States in the Asian-Pacific. This is
because the United States feels that the Chinese rise will make it become a global burden.
Besides, Chinese rise will possibly bring about aggression and xenophobia against other powers.
In addition, this rise will also promote scarcity of resources to the rest of the world.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bisley, Nick. Asia’s transformation, international relations and public policy. Australian Journal
of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.

DEREK, SCISSORS. The Great China Debate.Will Beijing Rule the World?
Ikenberry, G. John. American hegemony and East Asian order. Australian Journal of
InternationalAffairs. Published online: 27 Sep 2010.
Jeffery, Renée. Evaluating the ‘China threat’: power transition theory, the successor-state image
and the dangers of historical analogies. Australian Journal of International Affairs.
Published online: 26 Jun 2009.
Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august
2012.
Tang, Xiaosong. The future role of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region: dead end or
crossroads? Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 06 Jul 2011.
White, Hugh. Power shift: rethinking Australia’s place in the Asian century. Australian Journal
of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.