Why choose us?

We understand the dilemma that you are currently in of whether or not to place your trust on us. Allow us to show you how we can offer you the best and cheap essay writing service and essay review service.

Exploratory Factor Analysis.

Analysis and Synthesis of Prior Research

After reading the article, respond with your own thoughts in an edited, three-paragraph, formal academic

peer review. At a minimum, be sure to include the following elements:

� Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented.

� Evaluate the extent to which a Presenter has addressed the elements from the Learning Objectives for

this two-week pair.


Conceptualization, Analysis, and Synthesis of Key Research Concepts
As determined in the review, the writer synthesizes the accumulated knowledge on the
topic and emphasizes the essential research questions that have not been sufficiently covered by
other research inquiries. Additionally, the author of also develops theory, ensures that the
knowledge of the i8s synthesized and an evaluation is provided for substantive methodological
advances, a factor that develops inference into the analysis of the empirical study(Perdana, Robb,
& Rohde, 2015). A critical summary of the previous studies in this area are also reviewed thus
providing new conclusions into the subject area.
The presenter on the other hand addresses the elements of the learning objectives as
determined in the two-week pair. In this, the presenter capsulates highlights the essence of
conducting the review based on the specified research questions, the description the related
variables and the manner in which the related variables in the study would be included in the
research study(Plonsky, & Gonulal, 2015). This therefore determines that the presentation
captures the cohesive summary of the required concepts within the paper. However, the presenter
does not adequately provide an efficient evaluative approach for the implications of project
portfolio management.
It is therefore essential to note that the presenter provides a meaningful academic
argument in some areas that demonstrate the fluency of the comprehensive concepts identified in
the study. Through the analyzed literatures, the presenter identifies some of the related
hypothesis for the study that needed a careful approach into the application of an evaluation

criterion(Seal, & Ye, 2014). It is therefore essential to determine that presenter needs to generate
new approaches and ideologies on this area through the development of an effective evaluation
method for this research study.



Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2015). An Integrative Review and Synthesis of XBRL
Research in Academic Journals. Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 115-153.
Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological Synthesis in Quantitative L2 Research: A
Review of Reviews and a Case Study of Exploratory Factor Analysis. Language
Learning, 659-36.
Seal, W., & Ye, L. (2014). The balanced scorecard and the construction of a management control
discourse. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(4), 466-485.

All Rights Reserved, scholarpapers.com
Disclaimer: You will use the product (paper) for legal purposes only and you are not authorized to plagiarize. In addition, neither our website nor any of its affiliates and/or partners shall be liable for any unethical, inappropriate, illegal, or otherwise wrongful use of the Products and/or other written material received from the Website. This includes plagiarism, lawsuits, poor grading, expulsion, academic probation, loss of scholarships / awards / grants/ prizes / titles / positions, failure, suspension, or any other disciplinary or legal actions. Purchasers of Products from the Website are solely responsible for any and all disciplinary actions arising from the improper, unethical, and/or illegal use of such Products.